Source standards
For consequential operator-specific claims, we prefer official operator documentation, regulator or government material, responsible-gambling authorities and other primary sources. Reputable specialist publications may be used for comparison context, but they do not replace primary evidence for operator-specific facts.
Research and verification process
- Define the user need and page purpose.
- Map the important questions and entities.
- Identify evidence before making consequential claims.
- Separate fact from analysis and recommendation.
- Review page boundaries to reduce duplicate or cannibalizing content.
- Update materially changing facts when they are re-verified.
Affiliate and editorial separation
Commercial relationships are disclosed. A sponsored link does not convert promotional copy into evidence and does not justify unsupported claims. We do not invent guaranteed bonuses, payout speeds, licensing claims or winning strategies.
Corrections and updates
If a material factual error is identified, the intended approach is to correct the affected passage and any other page that repeats the same fact. Dates are updated only when there has been a substantive review or modification, not merely to create an appearance of freshness.
AI-assisted production
AI tools may assist with research organization, drafting, consistency checks and static-site production. Their use does not remove the requirement to verify consequential claims against suitable evidence or to distinguish sourced facts from editorial interpretation.